Network Security Insurance (sometimes referred to as Cyber Liability or Internet Liability) has been available for a little over 10 years. It was originally created to protect companies where technologies and the internet play an important role in basic day to day operations. Today, this is almost every business. For example :
As technology continues to play a bigger role in business we are becoming more exposed to emerging risks. Subsequently, companies are spending more time validating and reviewing the data security standards and risk management practices. In addition, many customers are now requiring proof of insurance that will address privacy breach events. Many federal and state regulatory agencies have put increasing responsibility for network security breaches on businesses. If you have ever received a letter notifying you of a security breach from an entity that you do business with then you have been impacted by these regulations.
The Internet is now a critical delivery channel for information, referrals, billing and research – automating traditional workflows can improve operational efficiency but can also bring new responsibilities and additional, unprecedented risks. The accessibility of the Internet increases vulnerability to the theft, alteration or accidental disclosure of personally identifiable information which can affect an organizations earnings, reputation and operations.
Most companies carry a general liability policy, which covers provides protection against suits from third parties alleging bodily injury or property damage (for example- you sell a product that causes an injury to a customer). The growing dependence upon the internet has given rise to very significant loss potentials related to privacy, intellectual property, network security and digital content disputes. These claims involve economic losses not bodily injury. Traditional insurance policies do not provide sufficient coverage with regards to network liability, failure to protect, or wrongful disclosure of, personally identifiable information and therefore, specific Cyber Liability policies should be considered as part of a comprehensive risk management program.
Hackers can access a database and steal large quantities of confidential data in seconds. Disgruntled employees can also use a company’s network to destroy information or steal it to sell for a profit. Protecting client’s confidential information is paramount but this risk should not be managed by firewall technology alone.
Liability arising from a wrongful disclosure of or failure to protect information can come from a variety of areas in addition to a “physical” breach of a company’s network security - information may be stored on a lap top which is subsequently stolen, data may be stored on a server at a third party location, information may be retrieved from disposal companies charged with destroying such information, paper files may be stolen – all of these scenarios may lead to third party law suits together with additional first party costs that will be incurred to comply with legislation governing requirements to notify all parties who may have had information compromised.
Examples of first party costs that would be covered include:Any company connected to the Internet is susceptible to viruses which can be inadvertantly transmitted to others resulting in legal liabilities as well as damage to, or destruction of client and other valuable information.
The Internet creates new exposures for content and advertising litigation – an example of this would be an incident in which content is added to the insured's website, copyrighted
Material from a third party is inadvertently included. The third party, aware of the unauthorized usage of the content, alleges damages.
Coverage for damages and defense arising from an attack on the insureds network, including by employees also, liability arising from the transmission of a computer virus, unauthorized access, denial of service attacks, failure to protect "Personally Identifiable Information" (PII)
Extends Security Liability to include liability arising from a failure to protect or wrongful disclosure of private information, violation of any federal or state in connection with protection of information - extends definition of network to include anywhere that PII is held.
1st Party coverage for expenses incurred following an attack including (but not limited to) Notification Costs (including postage, printing, drafting, call center costs), Credit Monitoring Costs, Crisis Management Costs (PR costs, advertising etc)
Coverage for damages and defense relating to the performance of the insureds Professional Services.
Coverage for the investigation and settlement of a cyber-extortion threat.
Coverage for damage, destruction, corruption, or theft of insureds information assets, including bandwidth, due to a covered attack on the insureds network.
Coverage for damages and defense relating to content based injuries such as libel, slander, defamation, copyright, title, trademark or invasion of privacy arising from the display of materials on insured's website etc.
Coverage for Loss of insureds Business Income & Extra Expenses incurred, both online and offline, resulting from a covered loss.
All insurance contain Insuring Agreements (coverage grants) and also exclusions and limitations, major exclusions found in Network Security policies include :
When assessing a risk for the purposes of providing a Network Security policy, Insurers require that the proposed insured company should have in place, or be prepared to consider implementing, the following risk control & risk management controls :
Ohio law makes ignoring potential data theft a luxury no business, large or small, can afford.
Recent data breaches underscore the reality of potential threats. If a data breach happens to you, you or your business may be forced to notify your clients or customers, or face hefty fines. What’s worse, if personal information is breached, so is the faith clients and customers have in you as a trusted business adviser. The new computer code Effective Feb. 17, 2006, Ohio HB 104, sponsored by State Rep. Earl Martin R-Avon Lake, amended the Ohio Revised Code to require consumer notification for breach of personal information.
Individuals, or any business or governmental entity that conducts business in the state of Ohio, must disclose to any consumer who resides in the state a breach of his or her personal information. Consumer notification is required if personal information is believed to have been accessed and acquired by an unauthorized person, and may cause risk of identity theft or other fraud. Personal information is defined as an individual’s first name, or first initial, and last name in combination with any one or more of the following:
In certain circumstances, alternative methods of notification may be employed. If the person or entity required to notify does not have sufficient contact information to provide notice, if the cost of notification would exceed $250,000, or the number of residents to whom notification must be made exceeds 500,000, a substitute notification method may be used.
Substitute notification methods include:
In addition, separate substitute notice methods may be used if the person or entity required to disclose employs fewer than 10 people, or the cost of notifying all affected consumers would exceed $10,000. In this case, substitute notice must include:
If the disclosure applies to more than 1,000 Ohio residents, the person or entity is required to notify the major national credit information agencies, such as Equifax and Experian.
H.B. 104 also provides the Ohio attorney general the authority to investigate compliance with the new regulations, and apply civil penalties in instances where noncompliance is proved.
Penalties for failing to properly notify affected consumers within 45 days include:
The new law also requires the judge in any case involving noncompliance to gauge whether the delay in notification was intentional or if disclosure was made in good faith when determining the amount of the fine. Maximum fines may be levied if the person or entity is found to have acted in bad faith, and the offending entity may also be liable for the costs of the attorney general’s investigation.
Delay of notification may be allowed if more expedient notification would interfere in the criminal investigation of the data breach. Additionally, financial institutions, which may be subject to separate and or additional notification requirements under federal law, are exempt from the requirements contained within H.B. 104.
The best way to avoid the need to notify your clients of a data breach is to prevent the breach in the first place. According to Chris Jenkins, chief technology strategist for The Ohio Society of CPAs, “It is not a matter of if your data will be breached, but when.” Precautionary measures can be taken to help prevent a breach of sensitive client information, and the potential loss of trust, examples include: